Аналитичка филозофија: Разлика помеѓу преработките

Quote on the definition: „'Analytic' philosophy today names a style of doing philosophy, not a philosophical program or a set of substantive views. Analytic philosophers, crudely speaking, aim for argumentative clarity and precision; draw freely on the tools of logic; and often identify, professionally and intellectually, more closely with the sciences and mathematics, than with the humanities.“</ref><ref>{{CiteНаведено journalсписание | last1 = Glock | first1 = H. J. | title = Was Wittgenstein an Analytic Philosopher? | doi = 10.1111/j.1467-9973.2004.00329.x | journal = Metaphilosophy | volume = 35 | issue = 4 | pages = 419–444 | year = 2004 | pmid = | pmc = }}</ref><ref>Colin McGinn, ''The Making of a Philosopher: My Journey through Twentieth-Century Philosophy'' (HarperCollins, 2002), p. xi.: „analytical philosophy [is] too narrow a label, since [it] is not generally a matter of taking a word or concept and analyzing it (whatever exactly thatthat might be). [...] This tradition emphasizes clarity, rigor, argument, theory, truth. It is not a tradition that aims primarily for inspiration or consolation or ideology. Nor is it particularly concerned with 'philosophy of life,' though parts of it are. This kind of philosophy is more like science than religion, more like mathematics than poetry – though it is neither science nor mathematics.“</ref>