Википедија

Википедија:Вандализам: Разлика помеѓу преработките

Интерактивен преглед на историјата
← Постаро уредувањеПоново уредување →
Избришана содржина Додадена содржина
НагледноВикитекст
Ред 101:
 
== Што не е вандализам ==
Иако на моменти погрешно наведени како такви, следниве нешта не се сметаат за „вандализам“ и затоа се третираат поинаку:
Although at times incorrectly referred to as such, the following things are not considered "vandalism" and are therefore treated differently:
 
==== Експериментирање од страна на нови корисници ====
;Tests by experimenting users: New users who discover the "edit this page" button sometimes want to experience editing a page and may add something unhelpful to a page (e.g., a few random characters) as a test. Such edits are not done in bad faith and are therefore ''not'' vandalism. Rather than be warned for vandalism, these users should be warmly greeted, and given a reference to the [[Wikipedia:Sandbox|sandbox]] (e.g., using the [[Template:Test|test template message]]) where they can continue to make test edits without being unintentionally disruptive. If a user has made a test edit and then reverted it, consider placing the message {{tl|test-self}} on their talk page.
;Using incorrect [[Wikipedia:Wiki markup|wiki markup]] and [[Wikipedia:Manual of style|manual of style]]: Inexperienced users often are unfamiliar with Wikipedia's formatting and grammatical standards (e.g. how to create internal and/or external links, when certain words should be bolded or italicized, etc.) Rather than label such users as vandals, just explain to them what our standard style is on the issue in hand - perhaps pointing them towards our documentation at [[Wikipedia:How to edit a page]], and the like. ▼
 
;[[Wikipedia:NPOV dispute|NPOV violations]]: The neutral point of view is a difficult policy for many of us to understand, and even Wikipedia veterans occasionally accidentally introduce material which is non-ideal from an NPOV perspective. Indeed, we are all affected by our beliefs to a greater or lesser extent. Though inappropriate, this is not vandalism in itself unless persisted in after being warned.▼
==== Користење несоодветен [[Википедија:Прирачник за стилот|стил на пишување]] и [[Помош:Како да уредам страница|речник]]====
;[[Wikipedia:Be bold in updating pages|Making bold edits]]: Wikipedians often make sweeping changes to pages in order to improve them - most of us aim to be bold when updating articles. While having large chunks of text you've written removed or substantially rewritten can be frustrating, simply making edits that noticeably alter the text or content of a pages should not be immediately labeled vandalism. ▼
▲;Using incorrect [[Wikipedia:Wiki markup|wiki markup]] and [[Wikipedia:Manual of style|manual of style]]: Inexperienced users often are unfamiliar with Wikipedia's formatting and grammatical standards (e.g. how to create internal and/or external links, when certain words should be bolded or italicized, etc.) Rather than label such users as vandals, just explain to them what our standard style is on the issue in hand - perhaps pointing them towards our documentation at [[Wikipedia:How to edit a page]], and the like.
;Unintentional misinformation: Sometimes a user will add content to an article that is factually inaccurate, but in the belief that it is accurate. By doing so in good faith, they are trying to contribute to the encyclopedia and improve it rather than vandalize. If you believe inaccurate information has been added to an article in good faith, ensure that it is, and/or discuss its factuality with the user who has submitted it. ▼
 
;[[Wikipedia:Patent nonsense|Unintentional nonsense]]: While intentionally adding nonsense to pages is a form of vandalism, sometimes honest editors may not have expressed themselves correctly (there may be an error in the [[syntax]], particularly for Wikipedians who use English as a [[second language]]). Also, sometimes connection errors or [[Wikipedia:Edit conflict|edit conflict]] unintentionally produce the appearance of nonsense or malicious edits. In either case, [[Wikipedia:Assume good faith|assume good faith]].▼
==== [[Википедија:Уредувачко војување|Уредувачко војување]] ====
;Stubbornness: Some users cannot come to agreement with others who are willing to talk to them about an editing issue, and repeatedly make changes opposed by everyone else. This is regrettable—you may wish to see our [[Wikipedia:Resolving disputes|dispute resolution pages]] to get help. Repeated deletion or addition of material may violate the [[WP:3RR|three-revert rule]], but this is not "vandalism" and should not be dealt with as such. ▼
▲;[[Wikipedia:NPOV dispute|NPOV violations]]: The neutral point of view is a difficult policy for many of us to understand, and even Wikipedia veterans occasionally accidentally introduce material which is non-ideal from an NPOV perspective. Indeed, we are all affected by our beliefs to a greater or lesser extent. Though inappropriate, this is not vandalism in itself unless persisted in after being warned.
;Harassment or personal attacks: We have a clear policy on Wikipedia of [[Wikipedia:No personal attacks|no personal attacks]], and harassing other contributors is not allowed. While some forms of harassment are also clear cases of vandalism, such as user page vandalism, or inserting a personal attack into an article, harassment in itself is not considered "vandalism" and should be handled differently.▼
 
;Unilateral policy/guideline alteration: While editors are encouraged to [[Wikipedia:Be bold in updating pages|be bold]], making edits to [[Wikipedia:Policy|Wikipedia policy]] pages (such as this one), proposed policy pages, [[Wikipedia:Guideline|guideline]] pages, etc. should require some knowledge of the consensus on that issue. If people misjudge consensus, this is not vandalism—however, making broad changes without prior discussion is not a productive approach. Continuing in such behavior after having been warned, however, may warrant a block.▼
==== [[Википедија:Бидете храбри во ажурирањето на страниците|Смело уредување]] ====
▲;[[Wikipedia:Be bold in updating pages|Making bold edits]]: Wikipedians often make sweeping changes to pages in order to improve them - most of us aim to be bold when updating articles. While having large chunks of text you've written removed or substantially rewritten can be frustrating, simply making edits that noticeably alter the text or content of a pages should not be immediately labeled vandalism.
 
==== [[Википедија:Проверливост|Ненамерни дезинформации]] ====
▲;Unintentional misinformation: Sometimes a user will add content to an article that is factually inaccurate, but in the belief that it is accurate. By doing so in good faith, they are trying to contribute to the encyclopedia and improve it rather than vandalize. If you believe inaccurate information has been added to an article in good faith, ensure that it is, and/or discuss its factuality with the user who has submitted it.
 
==== [[Википедија:Патент глупости|Ненамерни глупости]] ====
▲;[[Wikipedia:Patent nonsense|Unintentional nonsense]]: While intentionally adding nonsense to pages is a form of vandalism, sometimes honest editors may not have expressed themselves correctly (there may be an error in the [[syntax]], particularly for Wikipedians who use English as a [[second language]]). Also, sometimes connection errors or [[Wikipedia:Edit conflict|edit conflict]] unintentionally produce the appearance of nonsense or malicious edits. In either case, [[Wikipedia:Assume good faith|assume good faith]].
▲;Stubbornness: Some users cannot come to agreement with others who are willing to talk to them about an editing issue, and repeatedly make changes opposed by everyone else. This is regrettable—you may wish to see our [[Wikipedia:Resolving disputes|dispute resolution pages]] to get help. Repeated deletion or addition of material may violate the [[WP:3RR|three-revert rule]], but this is not "vandalism" and should not be dealt with as such.
 
==== Вознемирување или лични напади ====
▲;Harassment or personal attacks: We have a clear policy on Wikipedia of [[WikipediaВикипедија:NoБез personalлични attacksнапади|no personal attacks]], and harassing other contributors is not allowed. While some forms of harassment are also clear cases of vandalism, such as user page vandalism, or inserting a personal attack into an article, harassment in itself is not considered "vandalism" and should be handled differently.
 
==== Еднострана политика/промена во упатството ====
▲;Unilateral policy/guideline alteration: While editors are encouraged to [[Wikipedia:Be bold in updating pages|be bold]], making edits to [[Wikipedia:Policy|Wikipedia policy]] pages (such as this one), proposed policy pages, [[Wikipedia:Guideline|guideline]] pages, etc. should require some knowledge of the consensus on that issue. If people misjudge consensus, this is not vandalism—however, making broad changes without prior discussion is not a productive approach. Continuing in such behavior after having been warned, however, may warrant a block.
 
If a user treats situations which are not clear vandalism as such, then it is he or she who is actually harming the encyclopedia by alienating or driving away potential editors.
Преземено од „https://mk.wikipedia.org/wiki/Википедија:Вандализам“